I want to know what, exactly, a regular non-military,
non-law enforcement person really needs assault weapons and high capacity
magazines. What, exactly, are they
going to do with those? What
possible purpose, besides the ones we have been witnessing, can there be for
owning such firepower?
Well, a number of Republican senators certainly believe
that, even if there may not be identifiable use, any attempt to restrict access
would be a “restriction of our freedoms.”
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) drew a fairly strict line in the sand on Sunday with respect to the coming debate over gun control, suggesting that there is a constitutional right to buy high-capacity clips and magazines.
"Does something that would limit magazines that could carry 100 rounds, would that infringe on the constitutional right?" host Chris Wallace asked Johnson on "Fox News Sunday."
"I believe so," Johnson replied. "People will talk about unusually lethal weapons, that could be potentially a discussion you could have. But the fact of the matter is there are 30-round magazines that are just common. You simply can't keep these weapons out of the hands of sick, demented individuals who want to do harm. And when you try to do it, you restrict our freedoms."
Yep, that certainly makes
sense. I definitely remember the
Constitution, or maybe it was the Bill of Rights, or maybe it was the
Gettysburg Address, that specifically said that a citizen of the U.S. must have
access to firepower that can kill dozens and maybe hundreds of people in less
than a minute. Even though I
believe that flintlocks were the order of the day back around 1775 and 1776.
For a political party that just
LOVES to view the Constitution in what they believe was the original intent of
the Founding Fathers, they certainly can stretch a point when it comes to guns.
This is the mentality I am looking
at when I said in an earlier post on this subject that this country will never
change. Mass killings of innocent
bystanders by lunatics with easy access to any weapon their hearts desire and a
chip on their shoulder will not stop, because this country’s priorities have
“absolute freedom with anything to do with high power weaponry” is much higher
on our list than is keeping civilians safe.
Yeah, I know, if anyone were
reading this blog and I got comments, someone would no doubt say that even with
the type of restrictions I am talking about, we wouldn’t have stopped this
particular person from killing people, if that is what he wanted to do. And you know what? You may be right. But you also may be wrong. Maybe low capacity clips might have
slowed this guy down. Maybe…. If he didn’t have an assault rifle, he
might, must maybe, might have thought twice about his plan. The thing is, we can’t know for certain
until we try. And we aren’t going
to try. Because this nation’s
priorities are totally out of whack.
Now, of course, if this attack had
been perpetrated by a fanatical Iranian, our course as a nation would have been
very easy to determine. We go bomb
Iran and start another middle east war that will be much more difficult to win
and/or extract ourselves from than Iraq.
The TSA would no doubt make it that much more difficult to get on a
commercial airplane. The Dept. of
“Homeland Security” would issue more color-coded alerts. The government would probably push for
mass use of surveillance drones to spy on activities of anyone that looks
suspicious. But since this was a
nutjob loner white guy, well…
There’s just nothing that can be done about that.
I just can’t fathom Senator Ron
Johnson from the state of Wisconsin going on Fox News and saying something like
this, three days after the horrific day in Denver. He makes me a bit sick to my stomach. But, to others, he is no doubt hailed
as a “True American.”
UPDATE: Sorry this is difficult to read. I have absolutely no idea why Blogger decided to put this posts text in grey against a black background. I didn't do that and can't figure out how to change it.
UPDATE: Sorry this is difficult to read. I have absolutely no idea why Blogger decided to put this posts text in grey against a black background. I didn't do that and can't figure out how to change it.
No comments:
Post a Comment